After reading “Why A.I. Isn’t Going to Make Art” by Ted Chiang, I think Ted had some good points. For example, he said “A.I. can’t make art because it can’t make choices” and his point was that art comes from people’s experiences and decisions and not from a simple robot. I agree with Ted Chiang because A.I. doesn’t do nothing by itself and art gets created by emotions and decisions humans make. Ted Chiang argument resonates with my experience as a user of technology because people are using A.I. to code cheats in video games to outplay legit players which takes away the purpose of the game.

1.Can A.I. take peoples job because they could be somehow better than humans?

Tab 2

1.Chaing said about effort that people that use A.I. that they are not putting effort into their novels, such as the other people that are not using A.I. and are putting in their own thoughts.

2.Ted Chaing said college essays are import because they are a tool to strengthen and develop students writing and thinking skills. He also said that college essays are not only for the student’s thoughts but also for their ideas.

3.He said, “skill refers to how well one performs tasks, while intelligence is about how efficiently one learns skills.”

4.According to Ted Chiang A.I. is a fundamentally dehumanizing technology because people that use A.I. are not expressing their feelings or ideas on their writing and their all putting less effort into their writing because they know A.I. will do it for them.