I agree with Ted Chiang in this article. On his theory that art is the result of numerous individual decisions and human intention makes sense. A.I. lacks the emotions, experiences and effort that real art typically reflects and even if .A.I. doesn’t entirely replace human creativity, I believe it can still be a helpful tool that helps people start projects or generate ideas.

His point of view does align with how I use technology and modern AI tools. AI can be used to quickly generate text or ideas, but human editing, modification and addition typically yields the best results. In the absence of human input, the content frequently seems less significant or generic.

Question:

Will A.I tools become more advanced in the future, could they eventually allow human to make more creative choices and produce real art?